The Drop 2026 on nature
In short
Repairing nature pays only when someone owns the loss
Investors and founders at thirteen sessions on farms, food, oceans, cities and carbon found fixes that work, and kept stalling on who pays when the benefit is shared.
In some markets, a homeowner who fits storm shutters is charged a higher insurance premium, because the house is now worth more to cover. In California, homeowners' associations are paying together for robots that clear the vegetation behind the worst wildfires. Told at different tables, the two stories hold the finding that ran through The Drop's nature sessions. Many of the fixes exist. They find a buyer when one party carries a loss and can pay to reduce it. When the benefit spreads to the neighbours, the ocean at large or the public, the fix waits.
The Drop framed the theme around slow damage, farming that holds its yields by wearing down soil and biodiversity, with costs that build unseen until they are expensive to reverse. Across thirteen sessions, investors and founders kept meeting one reason those costs go unpriced. Whoever pays for a repair seldom keeps most of the benefit.
The neighbour problem
Kevin Webb of Superorganism gave the venture version. "We basically underwrite nature markets practically to zero when we're thinking about an investment," Kevin said at a Ripple with Ed Thorne of Sand River. Both funds back companies that solve a customer's problem now. Kevin would like to fund robots that restore habitat for nature alone, and said the money is not there yet.
Forests showed the arithmetic at Jeff Johnson and Kyle Teamey's Ripple on natural solutions. Fire mitigation that one owner pays for also protects the neighbours, so the cost falls on the few and the benefit on the many. The Californian associations get round that by paying together. At sea, James Lindsay of Builders Vision said nobody gets into shipping for altruistic reasons, and a shipowner with a clear case will always buy the best option. Many ocean solutions have no such customer, because they benefit the ocean at large.
The insurance Ripple found the same gap in food supply chains. Buyers leave the yield risk with producers, an adaptation investor said, so the buyers have no business case for adaptation. In the cities session, a participant said an air-conditioning unit on one house makes it hotter for the neighbour who cannot afford one.
Farming, where the theme began, had the starkest version. At Sanne Bootsma and Erica van Eeghen's Ripple, a founder working in cocoa said whoever has the biggest balance sheet becomes the farmer's buyer. That buyer trades cocoa, sugar or wheat to buy low and sell high, with no interest in the farmer's long-term health. Agriculture is a game of financial scarcity, the founder said, and whoever holds the money shapes what the farmer does.
Cheaper, or premium first
Where a buyer exists, the next test is price. "Make it cheaper, don't make it greener, and then people will adopt it," a growth-equity investor said at the ocean Ripple. A founder at the ingredients Ripple said people do not really pay for sustainability benefits, and the cocoa founder called regenerative farming an outcome that nobody really wants.
The textile-waste session showed what failing the test looks like. A founder's insulation made from textile waste works and sits in a warehouse, because buyers find it too expensive next to mineral wool. A product 20 or 30% dearer will not sell. Phytoform, on Lydia Chen's Bite-Size Climate Tech, aims each gene-edited crop at a cost. A dwarf tomato plant, nearly all fruit, answers the labour of tending glasshouse vines, and a potato that does not brown could remove 10–15% of the waste in the supply chain.
Others said new products have to start dear. A founder at the ingredients Ripple said more than 90% of new products in commodities such as soy, wheat, dairy and meat must go premium first. Michelle de Rijk of Fair Capital Impact Fund told companies to aim for high value, because waste feedstock is getting scarcer. The food-as-medicine Ripple showed who that route leaves out. Björn Öste, who built Oatly, once showed a healthy drink to the head nutritionist of Alabama, who said all their patients needed it and none of them could afford it.
Allowed to count
For carbon removal, the missing piece is permission. Removal already beats a few alternatives on cost, such as electric fuels for aviation, Robert Höglund of Milkywire said in an Expert Session. But where the rules keep it out of a company's near-term targets, "nothing can make it financially viable because it's not allowed." The European Commission's ETS proposal would treat removal as mitigation and have the EU buy 250 million tonnes up to 2040. The Science Based Targets initiative still leaves it out of near-term targets.
Rules made buyers elsewhere too, and unmade them. Ed said the EU Deforestation Regulation has companies buying plot-level data on where cocoa, bananas and shrimp come from. The UK's Biodiversity Net Gain drew new businesses, then was watered down, which Ed called a cautionary tale about novel regulation. Robert, asked about populist governments and the EU ETS, still named policy uncertainty as the biggest fear.
Where permission is missing entirely, stigma does the rest. Cooling the planet with stratospheric aerosols would mean 10 million tonnes a year, and Hugh Hunt said at a Ripple on climate repair that researchers may not release even one kilogram. Companies in the field are treated as pariahs. Insurers ought to be interested in marine cloud brightening, Hugh said, but the idea draws conspiracy theories, and once those start no insurer will touch it. Phytoform lives with a milder version, lumped in with GMOs and Monsanto although it adds no DNA to its crops.
Slow money, slow biology
Most of the capital in these sessions ran on the wrong clock. Venture investors look for 20–40% a year, Kyle said, and a forestry investor might accept 5–10%. A former farmer turned agtech investor said under 3% of agtech and food-tech exits in 15 years were IPOs, so investors there cannot chase power laws. Matt Stanley of BDC Capital put urban infrastructure on 10- and 20-year cycles, against venture's five to seven. James counted many ocean failures as failures of capital friction, not of product or founders.
Biology keeps its own pace. Seaweed farming has barely begun the breeding that took 10,000 years to make wild carrots into food, James said, and a potato plant gives Phytoform perhaps 10 to 20 tubers and one field season a year. Raising money takes patience too. On FoodTech Weekly, Mark Kahn said Omnivore met the IFC twice a year for ten years before it invested.
Nobody resolved who pays for benefits no one owns. Kyle said bridging those who cause damage and those who gain from repair has historically been a job for government, and a private marketplace for it would not be easy. At the cities Ripple, a corporate investor thought only mass public investment would change Milan's buildings, and said councils and states have no money. Places dire enough that people will pay together are rare, though, as someone at the natural-solutions Ripple added, they are getting less so. Buyers for repair are arriving the way The Drop's theme warned, once the damage is expensive. Whether anyone will pay sooner is still open.